Welcome to the latest edition of the Instrument Maneuver Spotlight series. Here we’ll highlight the various maneuvers you’ll practice during your instrument training and be expected to demonstrate during your checkride.
Before every instrument approach, a well-executed brief is essential for staying ahead of the airplane and ensuring a safe, stable arrival. This month’s spotlight focuses on the Approach Brief, a concise but structured review of critical approach elements including navigation, altitudes, and missed approach procedures. This briefing sets the tone for precision and preparedness in IMC.
Each maneuver is part of Sporty’s Instrument Rating Course and includes a narrated video animation, along with step-by-step instructions that include performance standards and common errors. Study them while on the ground or print them for quick reference in the airplane.
Would You Intercept the Inbound Without a Clearance?
Fly IFR and you’ll run into this situation soon enough: You’re on a base-leg vector to the localizer or inbound course. A kickin’ tailwind has you screaming over the ground. The needle comes alive, and you know you need to start the turn now or you’ll overshoot. However, ATC seems to have forgotten you. Do you start the turn as you try to verify you’re cleared to intercept the inbound course? Or do you hold your heading while clamoring for the clearance, knowing you’ll blow through and need a new heading to re-intercept?
This is one of those places where there’s a right and wrong answer per the regs, but it’s not so cut-and-dry in the real world. By the book it’s simple: You have not been cleared for the approach, so turning off your heading is a violation of 14 CFR 91.123 unless you have good reason to suspect communications failure or it’s an emergency. By the book, you’re going to blow through that inbound course.
Breaking the Rules
In practice, we often exercise a bit more self-determination tempered by situational awareness.
There are really only two possibilities in this situation: One is that the controller got distracted and wants us to turn. The other is the situation has changed, the controller plans to vector us through the inbound course, and has forgotten to tell us that by saying something like, “Fly heading 360. Vectors across the localizer.”
Obviously, the best thing to do is ask, “Do you want us to join the course inbound?” If the frequency is jammed up, you can raise your virtual hand by pushing IDENT to get the controller’s attention. Hopefully, one of those will do the trick.
But it might not. My experience is that if the controller is busy with other aircraft, or if I’m at a remote airport where I know the little blip representing me is in the back 40 of the controller’s scope, they probably want me to start the turn. More often that not, that’s what I’ve done, usually with a call to confirm that was right if it’s a non-towered airport, or even a quick call to Tower requesting that they relay the information.
Maybe I’ve just been lucky, but I’ve never been reprimanded for this. Quite the contrary; I’ve been apologized to and thanked plenty of times.
Could I have gotten in trouble? Sure. This decision carries risk. Aviation is all about managing risk, however, so how does this situation fit in?
Step one is working to avoid the situation altogether. Masterful IFR requires maintaining a pervasive awareness of the situation. You should know you’re converging on the final course with a tailwind, so you can proactively ask ATC if you’re cleared to intercept the final approach course even though you aren’t close.
Suppose you see this situation brewing while still a ways out on the base leg and your moving map makes it clear that your downwind heading is more like a 45 that’s diminishing distance between you and the inbound course rapidly. You could preemptively request the final heading and clearance rather than waiting. “Portland Approach, Cirrus Two Fox Tango. Request heading 220 now and approach clearance.” We’re all people. Sometimes a simple request makes life easier for everyone.
This isn’t for everyone. The consequence of obeying the letter of the law and flying through the localizer is usually only wasted time. I wouldn’t fault anyone for just trucking along and waiting. But it’s still worth mentally preparing for this situation. If that missed turn inbound puts you on course to rising terrain or other traffic you can see via your avionics, you have a bit more justification for taking matters into your own hands. The last thing you want is for the controller to remember you because a low-altitude or traffic alert went off in the control room.
The Opposite Issue: Communicating Before Turning
Question for you: When ATC tells you, “… left turn 130,” what’s the first thing you do?
Most people key the mic and parrot back the heading. Personally, I prefer to swing the heading bug and start the turn. I have two reasons.
The primary one is I can see if that turn makes sense to me before I accept it. If a left turn to 130 is a 280-degree turn, maybe ATC meant right, or maybe I misheard 130. Instead of accepting, I can ask for verification when I key up.
The second reason is to prevent spitting back a heading—and then forgetting to actually start the turn because I was in the middle of some other task when it came in. (Not that I’ve, um, ever done that or seen anyone else do it.) Even though ATC is waiting on your response, it only takes 2-3 extra seconds before you reply. Even New York controllers have that much patience. Well, usually.
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/17084918/Copy-of-cleared-for-the-approach-practical-ifr.png10001250Jeff Van Westhttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngJeff Van West2025-06-17 08:55:002025-06-20 14:50:43Practical IFR: “Cleared to Intercept?” A Common IFR Dilemma
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16105303/Copy-of-quiz-ifr-acronyms.png10001250Chris Clarkehttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngChris Clarke2025-06-13 08:55:292025-06-16 10:53:12Test Your Knowledge with This IFR Acronyms Quiz
Do you fly with SOPs? Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are commonly used in the corporate and airline flying world as a way of formalizing the do’s and don’ts of a flight department and making sure every pilot follows the same procedures. I’m generally suspicious of SOPs in life, because they limit your ability to be flexible and react creatively to life’s inevitable changes (we all like our freedom). But when it comes to IFR flying, I believe SOPs are a critical safety tool.
SOPs force you to think through what you will and won’t do in the airplane.
Why? Because SOPs force you to think through what you will and won’t do in the airplane, but in a disciplined way from the comfort of your home or office. Making these decisions at 200 feet and 120 knots is simply not a good idea. It’s best to consider your experience as a pilot, the airplane you fly, and the terrain you’re around, then create some black and white rules that you simply follow—no negotiation and no interpretation. An SOP should be clear and detailed, but also realistic. If you’re overly conservative, you may find yourself tempted to cheat, which defeats the whole purpose.
Obviously, SOPs can’t cover every scenario, and they don’t need to for GA pilots to improve their safety. Some key concepts are fairly universal, though. With that in mind, here are eight SOPs I follow when I fly IFR:
No second approaches.It’s astonishing how many accidents happen on the second attempt at the same instrument approach in bad weather. Often, the pilot will see a glimpse of the runway lights right as they go missed on the first approach. That makes the temptation to drop down “just a little more” the second time around very strong, and disaster likely awaits if you do. Besides, unless you really messed something up the first time or some equipment failed, the weather will not change enough in the 5 minutes it takes to go back around. If you flew a good approach and the weather was simply too low, go to your alternate.
No circling approaches at night. Circling approaches in low conditions are a challenge, as you try to stay above minimums but below the clouds—all the while keeping the runway in sight. Add in a dark night and things can get pretty ugly, especially in high terrain. That’s why a circling approach at night simply shouldn’t be an option for you, maybe with the exception of your home airport (since you probably know the approach and the terrain pretty well). The odds just aren’t in your favor, and with RNAV approaches to more and more runways it isn’t as helpful a maneuver as it once was. If a runway doesn’t have an approach these days, there’s probably a very good reason.
No takeoffs with less than approach minimums. If you’re flying under Part 91, it’s perfectly legal to take off in zero/zero conditions. I’ve actually done something close to that before, but only because the low weather was due to a very localized fog bank and I had excellent departure alternates close by—and I still didn’t like it. With rare exceptions, there is no reason to take off from an airport you can’t return to in case of emergency. The last thing you need to worry about if you have a fire or instrument failure after takeoff is making a zero/zero landing. A related SOP is that if the weather is below VFR minimums, it’s a good idea to have the departure airport’s instrument approach loaded just in case you do have to return. What might the “rare exceptions” be? That depends on your unique situation, but I could see an argument for departing an airport with no instrument approaches as long as there was a large airport very close by with an approach.
All approaches must be stabilized from final approach fix to runway. The segment from FAF to the missed approach point/runway is the most critical on an approach, and is the site of a lot of accidents. That means you need to be configured properly before the FAF and be able to focus exclusively on flying the airplane for those few minutes. While different pilots have different definitions of a “stabilized approach,” I aim to never exceed 1000fpm vertical speed, two dots of deflection on the HSI and 10% of desired airspeed. If you’re chasing the needle or going 20 knots too fast, hit the power and fly the missed approach. This is a time to be extra paranoid, because there just isn’t much time to fix a bad approach at 1500 feet.
Always land with 60 minutes of fuel. This one’s easy, and is valid for IFR or VFR flying. No matter what the FARs say, there’s no reason to land with less than an hour of fuel in the tanks. If you’ve ever seen the fuel gauges at 30 minutes, you know how ridiculously low that looks. Add in low clouds or rain and it goes from ridiculous to unsafe. Give yourself more options so when the day comes that the forecasts are all wrong you can safely get to an alternate.
If it’s really low, let the autopilot fly the approach. Some old school pilots may disagree with this, but I’m a firm believer in it. If the weather is really 200 and 1/2, swallow your pride and let George fly. That doesn’t mean you can’t fly the approach if needed, but rather that you choose to let the autopilot do it. That gives you the time to monitor all the conditions and maintain maximum situational awareness. Two important notes: you need to be proficient enough to hand fly the approach if needed (the autopilot should not be a crutch), and you need to know your autopilot extremely well (so it is configured properly and you can turn it off when you need to). But flying isn’t a contest to prove who the best pilot is; it’s about making it to your destination safely.
Call out 1000 feet to go on all climbs/descents. Altitude busts are some of the most common mistakes you can make as an instrument pilot, and while they may not cost you your life, they can ruin your day. Almost all professional crews use this one and you can too—even if you’re flying single pilot. When you’re within 1000 feet of your assigned altitude, you should be focused on leveling off properly. Even if your autopilot alerts you, look at your altimeter and verbally verify “1000 to go.” This is also the time for sterile cockpit rules—you don’t want to be talking about the ball game as you blow through your altitude. On an approach, you might want to add in callouts for 500 feet and 100 feet.
Do a takeoff and approach briefing every time. It doesn’t matter if you’re flying single pilot or as a crew, VFR or IFR, home base or far off land—always do a takeoff and approach briefing. This can be as quick as a sentence or as long as a few minutes, but you should have a plan for the two most critical phases of flight. A takeoff briefing usually confirms which runway will be used, what the airplane configuration will be, and what to do if the engine fails at different points along the climbout (when is it safe to turn around?). A landing briefing confirms the runway length is appropriate, considers the obstacles/terrain, and specifies the landing configuration to be used (full flaps or partial?). For an instrument approach, review the entire procedure, but focus on a few critical facts: inbound course, bottom altitude, and the first part of the missed approach are a good place to start. Get in the habit of doing a briefing and it will become second nature.
The process of creating SOPs forces you to evaluate your risk tolerance.
Don’t rush through the process of creating your own personal SOPs. The research and reflection required to build a good list is almost as valuable as using them in flight, because it forces you to evaluate your risk tolerance, your airplane’s performance, and your personal experience and proficiency.
At the end of the day, SOPs are all about building in some margins. Night circling approaches can be done safely, for example, but there’s almost no margin for error. Eliminating this from your flying increases your safety margins and keeps you disciplined. And discipline is what instrument flying is all about—follow the rules, every time, no matter what.
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16105456/Copy-of-8-sops-could-save-your-life.png10001250John Zimmermanhttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngJohn Zimmerman2025-06-10 08:55:202025-06-16 10:55:068 IFR SOPs That Could Save Your Life
Most of the information filed in an IFR flight plan is based on weather forecasts that are released well before your wheels ever leave the ground. Here’s a look at what parts of the flight plan actually matter to ATC so that you know how to react if and when the weather conditions don’t match the forecast.
To take the next step, check out Sporty’s Instrument Rating Course, which includes 13 hours of in-flight HD cross-country and instrument approach video training and comprehensive written test preparation tools.
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/16105638/Copy-of-Copy-of-IFR-flight-plans.png10001250IFR Focus Teamhttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngIFR Focus Team2025-06-06 08:50:272025-06-16 10:56:45Video Tip: Filing an IFR Flight Plan? Here’s What Matters Most to ATC
Instrument flying is demanding. It’s also deeply rewarding—when you’re prepared.
A note from the editor:
As both a pilot and a flight instructor, I know firsthand how easy it is to lose your edge when it comes to instrument flying. Proficiency isn’t just about staying legal—it’s about staying sharp, confident, and ready for whatever ATC or the weather throws your way.
That’s why we created IFR Focus—a new destination dedicated entirely to the art and science of flying in the system.
Whether you’re an experienced IFR pilot looking to stay sharp or a student climbing toward that checkride, you’ll find practical content here to help you fly safer, smoother, and smarter. We’re talking:
Real-world articles written by instrument pilots
Video tips that demonstrate techniques, not just talk about them
Scenarios that challenge your thinking and build judgment
Quizzes to reinforce what you know (and reveal what you don’t)
Flight maneuvers, chart insights, and avionics techniques
And most of all, our monthly signature feature: Practical IFR
Jeff Van West brings you Practical IFR.
At the heart of each monthly email is Practical IFR, an in-depth feature written by noted instructor and aviation writer Jeff Van West. Think of it as a cross between a blog and a deep-dive article, tackling real IFR questions and offering actionable tips you can apply to your next flight.
Do you turn onto the localizer if you’re about to blast through it but haven’t been cleared?
How should you manage glide performance engine-out in IMC with a strong headwind?
Could lowering your personal minimums actually make you a safer pilot?
These are the kinds of real-world scenarios Practical IFR explores—with written analysis, a related video tip, and a quiz question to round it out.
No spam. No fluff. Just focused IFR training you can use.
IFR Focus—a new destination dedicated entirely to the art and science of flying in the system.
We hope you enjoy the site and the newsletter. Your feedback helps us make it better—feel free to reach out anytime at IFRFocus@Sportys.com.
— Eric Radtke Editor, IFR Focus
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/25110655/Copy-of-Copy-of-welcome-to-IFR-focus.png10001250Eric Radtkehttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngEric Radtke2025-05-30 11:27:352025-09-26 09:46:44Welcome to IFR Focus: Sharpen Your Skills, Master the System
Instrument Maneuver Spotlight: Approach Brief
/by Eric RadtkeWelcome to the latest edition of the Instrument Maneuver Spotlight series. Here we’ll highlight the various maneuvers you’ll practice during your instrument training and be expected to demonstrate during your checkride.
Before every instrument approach, a well-executed brief is essential for staying ahead of the airplane and ensuring a safe, stable arrival. This month’s spotlight focuses on the Approach Brief, a concise but structured review of critical approach elements including navigation, altitudes, and missed approach procedures. This briefing sets the tone for precision and preparedness in IMC.
Each maneuver is part of Sporty’s Instrument Rating Course and includes a narrated video animation, along with step-by-step instructions that include performance standards and common errors. Study them while on the ground or print them for quick reference in the airplane.
The flight maneuver is from Sporty’s Instrument Rating Course.
Practical IFR: “Cleared to Intercept?” A Common IFR Dilemma
/by Jeff Van WestWould You Intercept the Inbound Without a Clearance?
Fly IFR and you’ll run into this situation soon enough: You’re on a base-leg vector to the localizer or inbound course. A kickin’ tailwind has you screaming over the ground. The needle comes alive, and you know you need to start the turn now or you’ll overshoot. However, ATC seems to have forgotten you. Do you start the turn as you try to verify you’re cleared to intercept the inbound course? Or do you hold your heading while clamoring for the clearance, knowing you’ll blow through and need a new heading to re-intercept?
This is one of those places where there’s a right and wrong answer per the regs, but it’s not so cut-and-dry in the real world. By the book it’s simple: You have not been cleared for the approach, so turning off your heading is a violation of 14 CFR 91.123 unless you have good reason to suspect communications failure or it’s an emergency. By the book, you’re going to blow through that inbound course.
Breaking the Rules
In practice, we often exercise a bit more self-determination tempered by situational awareness.
There are really only two possibilities in this situation: One is that the controller got distracted and wants us to turn. The other is the situation has changed, the controller plans to vector us through the inbound course, and has forgotten to tell us that by saying something like, “Fly heading 360. Vectors across the localizer.”
Obviously, the best thing to do is ask, “Do you want us to join the course inbound?” If the frequency is jammed up, you can raise your virtual hand by pushing IDENT to get the controller’s attention. Hopefully, one of those will do the trick.
But it might not. My experience is that if the controller is busy with other aircraft, or if I’m at a remote airport where I know the little blip representing me is in the back 40 of the controller’s scope, they probably want me to start the turn. More often that not, that’s what I’ve done, usually with a call to confirm that was right if it’s a non-towered airport, or even a quick call to Tower requesting that they relay the information.
Maybe I’ve just been lucky, but I’ve never been reprimanded for this. Quite the contrary; I’ve been apologized to and thanked plenty of times.
Could I have gotten in trouble? Sure. This decision carries risk. Aviation is all about managing risk, however, so how does this situation fit in?
Step one is working to avoid the situation altogether. Masterful IFR requires maintaining a pervasive awareness of the situation. You should know you’re converging on the final course with a tailwind, so you can proactively ask ATC if you’re cleared to intercept the final approach course even though you aren’t close.
Suppose you see this situation brewing while still a ways out on the base leg and your moving map makes it clear that your downwind heading is more like a 45 that’s diminishing distance between you and the inbound course rapidly. You could preemptively request the final heading and clearance rather than waiting. “Portland Approach, Cirrus Two Fox Tango. Request heading 220 now and approach clearance.” We’re all people. Sometimes a simple request makes life easier for everyone.
This isn’t for everyone. The consequence of obeying the letter of the law and flying through the localizer is usually only wasted time. I wouldn’t fault anyone for just trucking along and waiting. But it’s still worth mentally preparing for this situation. If that missed turn inbound puts you on course to rising terrain or other traffic you can see via your avionics, you have a bit more justification for taking matters into your own hands. The last thing you want is for the controller to remember you because a low-altitude or traffic alert went off in the control room.
The Opposite Issue: Communicating Before Turning
Question for you: When ATC tells you, “… left turn 130,” what’s the first thing you do?
Most people key the mic and parrot back the heading. Personally, I prefer to swing the heading bug and start the turn. I have two reasons.
The primary one is I can see if that turn makes sense to me before I accept it. If a left turn to 130 is a 280-degree turn, maybe ATC meant right, or maybe I misheard 130. Instead of accepting, I can ask for verification when I key up.
The second reason is to prevent spitting back a heading—and then forgetting to actually start the turn because I was in the middle of some other task when it came in. (Not that I’ve, um, ever done that or seen anyone else do it.) Even though ATC is waiting on your response, it only takes 2-3 extra seconds before you reply. Even New York controllers have that much patience. Well, usually.
Test Your Knowledge with This IFR Acronyms Quiz
/by Chris ClarkeCan you define all these IFR aviation acronyms?
Share the quiz to show your results !
Facebook
Facebook
Share your results :
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Want to brush up on your IFR knowledge? Check out Sporty’s Instrument Rating Course
8 IFR SOPs That Could Save Your Life
/by John ZimmermanDo you fly with SOPs? Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are commonly used in the corporate and airline flying world as a way of formalizing the do’s and don’ts of a flight department and making sure every pilot follows the same procedures. I’m generally suspicious of SOPs in life, because they limit your ability to be flexible and react creatively to life’s inevitable changes (we all like our freedom). But when it comes to IFR flying, I believe SOPs are a critical safety tool.
SOPs force you to think through what you will and won’t do in the airplane.
Why? Because SOPs force you to think through what you will and won’t do in the airplane, but in a disciplined way from the comfort of your home or office. Making these decisions at 200 feet and 120 knots is simply not a good idea. It’s best to consider your experience as a pilot, the airplane you fly, and the terrain you’re around, then create some black and white rules that you simply follow—no negotiation and no interpretation. An SOP should be clear and detailed, but also realistic. If you’re overly conservative, you may find yourself tempted to cheat, which defeats the whole purpose.
Obviously, SOPs can’t cover every scenario, and they don’t need to for GA pilots to improve their safety. Some key concepts are fairly universal, though. With that in mind, here are eight SOPs I follow when I fly IFR:
The process of creating SOPs forces you to evaluate your risk tolerance.
Don’t rush through the process of creating your own personal SOPs. The research and reflection required to build a good list is almost as valuable as using them in flight, because it forces you to evaluate your risk tolerance, your airplane’s performance, and your personal experience and proficiency.
At the end of the day, SOPs are all about building in some margins. Night circling approaches can be done safely, for example, but there’s almost no margin for error. Eliminating this from your flying increases your safety margins and keeps you disciplined. And discipline is what instrument flying is all about—follow the rules, every time, no matter what.
Video Tip: Filing an IFR Flight Plan? Here’s What Matters Most to ATC
/by IFR Focus TeamMost of the information filed in an IFR flight plan is based on weather forecasts that are released well before your wheels ever leave the ground. Here’s a look at what parts of the flight plan actually matter to ATC so that you know how to react if and when the weather conditions don’t match the forecast.
To take the next step, check out Sporty’s Instrument Rating Course, which includes 13 hours of in-flight HD cross-country and instrument approach video training and comprehensive written test preparation tools.
Welcome to IFR Focus: Sharpen Your Skills, Master the System
/by Eric RadtkeInstrument flying is demanding. It’s also deeply rewarding—when you’re prepared.
A note from the editor:
That’s why we created IFR Focus—a new destination dedicated entirely to the art and science of flying in the system.
Whether you’re an experienced IFR pilot looking to stay sharp or a student climbing toward that checkride, you’ll find practical content here to help you fly safer, smoother, and smarter. We’re talking:
Jeff Van West brings you Practical IFR.
At the heart of each monthly email is Practical IFR, an in-depth feature written by noted instructor and aviation writer Jeff Van West. Think of it as a cross between a blog and a deep-dive article, tackling real IFR questions and offering actionable tips you can apply to your next flight.
These are the kinds of real-world scenarios Practical IFR explores—with written analysis, a related video tip, and a quiz question to round it out.
No spam. No fluff. Just focused IFR training you can use.
IFR Focus—a new destination dedicated entirely to the art and science of flying in the system.
We hope you enjoy the site and the newsletter. Your feedback helps us make it better—feel free to reach out anytime at IFRFocus@Sportys.com.
—
Eric Radtke
Editor, IFR Focus