Flying on instruments into big cities is a great way to use the rating – you’re always on a published IFR procedure, guided by ATC. You can land right in the metro area, close to transportation and destination options. Pilots based under a Class B shelf or at a high-traffic Class C airport are probably familiar with these perks and are used to busy airspace. For those who fly in quieter environments, though, “big and busy” can seem overwhelming. But it’s well within any IFR pilot’s capabilities if treated like challenging weather or a new aircraft – using training, preparation, and personal minimums to expand the envelope safely.
Routing and Orientation
Let’s begin by pointing out that flying IFR into Bravo airspace isn’t as scary as you might think once you see the process. Start with routing, and know that STARs (Standard Terminal Arrivals) and SIDs (Standard Instrument Departures) are your friends. If you learned that small aircraft can file “No STARs/SIDs” and get away with it, that’s only partly true and depends on the airspace. This remark on the flight plan can be disregarded and often is – more on that later. Or it can cost you a lot of avgas because ATC will vector you around other aircraft flying those procedures.
With that in mind, let’s go to St. Louis Regional (KALN), just under the Class B shelf for Lambert International (KSTL). Check the weather and where the airline traffic is flowing to get an idea of where Approach is directing traffic to satellite airports. Also look at recently cleared routes to help file a feasible flight plan. Include an early fix from a STAR if it fits your arrival direction. Even if a procedure has speeds and altitudes for turbines or is labeled so, waypoints on these routes can be assigned to pistons at lower altitudes. For St. Louis Regional, there are two STARs. Coming from the north, you might use all or some of FARMR THREE. This is shared among other nearby airports, so be sure to find “St. Louis Regional” for designated runways using the STAR. If you expect the RNAV 11, notice that the STAR instructions include FASHE, an initial fix to the approach.
Route amendments are common, so review the charts and practice loading, activating and amending these on your avionics. That might include VNAV features on your GPS and autopilot, which are handy for crossing-altitude assignments. If you have GPSes 1 and 2 and can do quick changes, consider turning off the cross-fill to load a separate flight plan on the No. 2 with another possible route. This can help you find and spell a fix quickly to amend the active route, or even replace a flight plan. In fact, ATC often issues shortcuts on STARs when traffic allows and will clear you direct to an upcoming fix.
Managing Workload
It’s also common for ATC to break you off an arrival to vector you into an approach, so maintain situational awareness as you near a portion of the IAP. ATIS and preceding aircraft will give you early cues of what’s ahead. You might get instructions on airspeed, such as “maintain best forward speed” for spacing. In that case, the maximum IAS is up to you and ATC will monitor the situation. If told to “maintain 120 knots,” copy and comply. If you’re uncomfortable with any instruction, say “unable” and offer a compromise. If you can’t manage 120 knots, maybe 110 is workable. And even though they’re busy, controllers will address “say again” and requests to clarify routes or clearances. They do it for all types of aircraft. Sure, it’s best to minimize the transmissions and keep up with the flow, so this is where solid communications skills go a long way to help you fit into a fast-paced environment.
If you’re uncomfortable with any instruction, say “unable” and offer a compromise.
Along with ensuring you’re “up to speed” for this flight, your best line of defense is to manage workload. Take action the moment you feel you’re getting behind. If you’re not ready for that approach intercept, slowing down by 5–10 knots (or whatever you can) gives you that precious few seconds to check your setup. If you’re feeling rushed, you’re likely to start talking faster and pushing buttons quickly, making errors more likely. ATC has ways to help you buy time if you let them know. You can request speed changes, delay vectors, or even a hold at a fix that’s out of the way of the traffic flow. These tools are also available if there’s an issue you want to troubleshoot. This is why I like to step up my IFR fuel reserves when planning flights into busy airspace. Another reason to have as much fuel as practical is in case of delays that affect many aircraft at once, like thunderstorms or a sudden runway closure.
Take action the moment you feel you’re getting behind.
These strategies apply on the outbounds, too, starting on the ground. Like arrivals, SIDs (Standard Instrument Departures) can be part of a cleared route that uses all or part of the procedure. At St. Louis Regional, you’ll likely start with a departure heading and altitude followed by vectors towards a fix on the chart, as in the LINDBERGH NINE. This SID has three published transitions from the STL navaid for aircraft going southbound. All are straightforward, and you might get something even easier, like runway heading to 3000, then “cleared direct MYERZ” followed by a clearance to a fix on your route.
Training and Preparation
Some additional advice before flying in busy airspace:
Assess your skills and get training to improve on navigation, communication, and IFR procedures. Adjust personal limitations accordingly, and be realistic. If you’re not fluent with ATC in non-congested situations, it only gets tougher in Bravo airspace. You might have a stressful experience or get behind the airplane, which is worse than getting behind ATC (back to aviate, navigate, communicate). Consider a VFR day to file IFR to a busy airport for the first time.
Learn about the additional layers at the biggest airports. For example, the main St. Louis hub, Lambert International, has “D-ATIS” (Digital ATIS) broadcast in a robotic voice. There are multiple Ground and Tower frequencies based on your geographic location on the ground or direction of departure. Included is a Metering frequency to call before Ground; that controller coordinates aircraft about to taxi. To sample the real deal, you can listen to various frequencies online at LiveATC.net. Along that theme, study complex airport layouts to get an idea of what to expect. If you know a pilot who has been to the airport in question, you can gain a lot of valuable tips.
Fix mistakes in stride and stay calm. Did you ever read back the wrong frequency? This happens all the time, even to airline pilots, and nobody gets upset. Be concise in your correction and move on. Need a phonetic spelling for a fix? Don’t be shy about asking – the pros aren’t, because they know that any doubts can be dangerous.
It’s all about good situational awareness and cockpit management in a busy environment. These flights are a great opportunity to build knowledge and skills, which will help ensure you can fully enjoy the conveniences of going into big-city airports.
What would you do if an engine problem developed in actual IMC but the nearest airport wasn’t necessarily your safest option?
That’s the dilemma in this month’s IFR Mastery scenario from PilotWorkshops, The End Is Niagara?, featuring instructor Martin Pauly.
You’re flying your RV-14 with your new spouse toward Niagara Falls when the engine suddenly begins running rough in IMC. One cylinder’s EGT and CHT are dropping rapidly, and your troubleshooting attempts don’t solve the problem. The nearest airport is only 10 miles away, but the instrument approach could leave you below glide range over hilly terrain. Better weather and potentially better options lie farther ahead.
One of the most valuable aspects of instrument flying is learning to recognize the tradeoffs behind every decision. Often, the challenge isn’t knowing how to fly an approach—it’s deciding which approach offers the greatest margin of safety given the conditions.
That’s exactly what IFR Mastery is designed to develop. Each month, PilotWorkshops presents a new real-world IFR scenario that puts you in the pilot’s seat. You’ll evaluate the situation, make your decision, and then—inside the full program—compare your thinking with experienced instructors as they explain the factors that influenced their choice.
Think you’ve made the right call?
Watch the free scenario briefing above, then start a free 30-day trial to access the complete scenario, instructor analysis, and the complete library of VFR and IFR Mastery scenarios.
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/04100531/New-IFR-Mastery-ScenarioThe-End-Is-Niagara.png10001250Eric Radtkehttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngEric Radtke2026-09-04 10:06:212026-09-04 10:30:30New IFR Mastery Scenario:The End Is Niagara?
Professional Preparation for Single-Pilot IFR in Busy Airspace
The phone call came from a recently instrument-rated Cirrus pilot sitting at a busy Class B airport with the engine running. He had received his IFR clearance, but he did not understand what Air Traffic Control had given him. The frequency was busy, the FBO line person was watching and waiting patiently to marshal him out of parking, and the pressure he felt was increasing by the minute.
His problem was not that he could not fly an instrument approach. He had recently demonstrated that skill well enough to earn an instrument rating. His problem was that he had never experienced an operation like this.
The FAA’s Instrument Airplane Airman Certification Standards establish the knowledge and skills required for certification, but no practical test can reproduce every environment a pilot may encounter afterward. Although the ACS requires knowledge of Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs), Standard Terminal Arrival Routes (STARs), climb gradients, and associated constraints, the practical test does not specifically require an applicant to fly an actual SID or STAR or demonstrate the “climb via” and “descend via” clearances that commonly accompany them. Nor does it require operations at busy Class B or Class C airports where these procedures are routine.
Busy airspace is not the place to learn those functions for the first time.
Nevertheless, after earning an instrument rating, a pilot may legally depart Atlanta, arrive at Dallas/Fort Worth, or fly into Chicago O’Hare. The pilot in my opening story was qualified, but he had not yet developed the operational experience necessary to manage that environment comfortably.
In Part 121 operations, complex environments are managed through standardization, preparation, defined procedures, and shared cockpit responsibilities. A single pilot does not have another crewmember available to catch an error or absorb part of the workload, but many of the same professional habits can be adapted to the Part 91 cockpit. The objective is to anticipate workload before it arrives.
The objective is to anticipate workload before it arrives.
Prepare Before Engine Start
Professional pilots do not wait for the cockpit to become busy before preparing. If departing a large airport, review the likely runway and SID before contacting Clearance Delivery. Understand the routing, altitude restrictions, climb gradient, navigation requirements, and what a “climb via” clearance will require.
Consider using services that provide Pre-Departure Clearance (PDC) and digital ATIS when available through a compatible avionics or electronic flight bag provider. Receiving the clearance and D-ATIS electronically allows time to review the routing, study the SID, and program the Flight Management System before starting the engine. The objective is not merely convenience. It is reducing workload before the airplane begins moving.
If a clearance received via PDC or radio does not make sense, ask ATC to clarify it. Do not allow embarrassment or concern about occupying the frequency to turn uncertainty into an incorrect clearance. Controllers would rather clarify or repeat an instruction than have a pilot misunderstand it.
Avionics proficiency is equally important. Modern FMS and GPS navigators make complex procedures manageable—but only when the pilot understands how to use them. Before operating in busy terminal airspace, become proficient at loading and modifying SIDs, STARs, transitions, and approaches. Busy airspace is not the place to learn those functions for the first time.
One common trap involves STARs that divide into runway-specific segments. When loading the arrival, the navigator may require selection of the expected landing runway. Without that selection, the route may end near the waypoint where the STAR branches rather than continue along the appropriate runway transition. Understand how the installed avionics handle these procedures before encountering them under time pressure.
Use Cruise Time Wisely
Professional pilots rarely regard cruise as the boring part of a flight. It is valuable preparation time.
Obtain the destination weather and ATIS early enough to complete arrival planning before beginning the descent. Review the expected STAR, including its altitude and airspeed restrictions, and prepare the most likely approach. If more than one runway or approach appears likely, identify an alternate rather than waiting for a change from ATC.
Even when expecting a visual approach, load and brief an appropriate instrument approach as a backup—preferably one with vertical guidance. Resist the temptation to load a GPS-generated visual approach if your navigator offers that option. At many busy airports, controllers expect aircraft to navigate to the Final Approach Fix associated with the published ILS or RNAV approach because that is where speed restrictions and sequencing are often built into the arrival. Airline crews are generally required to have an instrument approach loaded in the FMS even when cleared for a visual approach, so ATC may issue instructions referencing that procedure. Loading the corresponding instrument approach improves situational awareness, supports those instructions, provides a stabilized vertical path, and reduces the chance of landing at the wrong airport or runway.
Loading a procedure is only the first step. Verify that you’ve selected the correct runway and transition, then compare the programmed flight plan with the current published chart. Confirm the lateral routing, altitude constraints, airspeed restrictions, and missed approach procedure. In a two-pilot flight deck, both crewmembers independently verify the programming. A single pilot doesn’t have that second set of eyes, making an unhurried chart-to-screen comparison even more important.
The briefing should be concise and useful. Rather than reading the chart aloud, brief the applicable minimums and enter them into your avionics if that capability is available. Then concentrate on what is unusual or most likely to cause an error: localizer frequency identification and setup, a difficult crossing restriction, terrain, an offset final, parallel runways, a complicated missed approach, runway conditions, or the possibility of a late runway change.
The purpose of a briefing is not to prove that you can read the chart. It is to identify threats before they demand your attention, verify that the waypoints loaded in the FMS match the current chart, and confirm that the correct approach minimums have been entered.
Know When to Say “Unable”
ATC clearances are designed to maintain an efficient traffic flow, but controllers cannot know every aircraft’s limitations. STARs serving airline hubs may contain speeds around 290 knots to sequence transport-category airplanes. That may exceed the operating limitations of many smaller general aviation aircraft.
If your aircraft cannot comply, advise ATC promptly: “Unable the 290 knots.” The same principle applies to climb gradients, descent rates, crossing restrictions, or any other clearance beyond the capabilities of the aircraft or pilot.
“Unable” is not a sign of weakness. It is useful information and a sign of sound judgment.
If an unexpected change requires additional programming, tell ATC that you need time. A request for extended vectors or additional track miles is preferable to hurried button-pushing while the airplane continues toward the terminal area. If necessary, request holding until the new procedure can be loaded, briefed, and verified.
ATC controls the sequence, but the pilot still controls whether the airplane is ready to proceed.
“Unable” is not a sign of weakness. It is useful information and a sign of sound judgment.
Do Not Forget the Airport
Ground operations deserve the same preparation as the flight itself. Many instrument training flights take place at airports with relatively simple taxiway layouts. At large Class B airports, however, taxiways often have two-letter identifiers. At Dallas/Fort Worth, for example, a clearance might include Taxiways EM or EL. To a pilot encountering those names for the first time, the instructions may sound like a rapid string of unrelated letters.
Have the airport diagram open before the airplane moves. Review hotspots, anticipate the likely taxi route, and write down lengthy instructions. If uncertain, stop the aircraft and ask Ground Control for clarification.
Arrival planning should continue through landing and taxi. Before touchdown, anticipate the likely runway exit and know the general direction of parking. This is not the time to be asking yourself, “Do I turn off to the right or left?” At a large airport, the workload does not end when the wheels touch the runway.
Creating Time
Busy airspace is not challenging merely because controllers talk quickly or airports are large. It is challenging because several high-workload tasks can occur simultaneously, and ATC generally expects pilots to understand and promptly comply with the clearances they accept.
The pilot who first begins thinking about the arrival after top of descent will probably feel rushed. The pilot who has already reviewed the STAR, prepared an alternate approach, verified the avionics, briefed the threats, opened the airport diagram, and considered the taxi route will often find the same operation surprisingly manageable.
The objective is not to make a personal airplane operate like an airliner. It is to borrow the professional habits that allow airline crews to manage complex operations safely and efficiently.
Busy airspace rewards preparation and exposes its absence. Review the procedures early, understand the capabilities of your avionics and aircraft, brief the threats, and create additional time whenever the operation begins moving faster than you can safely manage it.
The frequency may be busy, but the cockpit does not have to be. Staying ahead of the airplane begins long before the controller starts talking quickly.
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/26160736/Before-the-Frequency-Gets-Busy.png10001250Tim Deckerhttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngTim Decker2026-09-01 08:55:212026-08-26 16:09:46Before the Frequency Gets Busy
There is no magic number of minutes or percentage of a flight that every instrument pilot should spend hand-flying. The right balance depends on the pilot, the airplane, the conditions, and the workload. But there is an important distinction between using automation and becoming dependent on it.
If the autopilot is available, working properly, and reducing workload and fatigue, that’a s good thing and there is nothing inherently wrong with using it extensively—even for an entire IFR flight. The key is to make sure you’re still maintaining the skills required to fly the airplane when the automation isn’t available.
Make proficiency part of your normal flying
One of the easiest ways to maintain hand-flying skills is to incorporate short periods of manual flying into routine flights when conditions and workload permit. For example, you might establish a personal rule to hand-fly the departure through a certain altitude, or disconnect the autopilot for a portion of the arrival. You could also hand-fly an approach when you’re in VMC or under simulated instrument conditions and have a safety pilot. So rather than thinking, “I should hand-fly more,” establish habits or general rules that make it happen.
Practice meaningful skills
Hand-flying isn’t simply keeping the wings level. Use those opportunities to practice the skills you’ll actually need if the automation becomes unavailable. Work on precise heading and altitude control, airspeed management, intercepts, course tracking, approaches, missed approaches, and transitions between different phases of flight. If you’re flying with a safety pilot or CFII, use the opportunity to introduce realistic challenges rather than simply flying a perfectly smooth, straight-and-level segment.
The goal isn’t to prove that you can fly without the autopilot. It’s to remain proficient when you’re forced to.
Don’t turn proficiency practice into a problem
There’s also a danger in taking the “hand-fly more” philosophy too far. If you’re in actual IMC, navigating complex airspace, dealing with weather, managing a high-workload arrival, or troubleshooting another problem, there may be no good reason to disconnect a perfectly functioning autopilot simply to get some practice. Automation is a tool for managing workload. Use it when it provides a safety or workload advantage.
Be ready for the day automation isn’t available
An autopilot failure in benign VMC is an inconvenience. An unexpected automation problem in IMC, during a busy arrival, or while managing an approach can immediately increase workload. The pilot who regularly practices hand-flying doesn’t have to learn—or relearn—the skill at the same time they’re dealing with the problem that caused the automation to become unavailable.
That’s the real goal of proficiency. Use automation because it makes you a better, more capable pilot—not because you’ve forgotten how to fly without it.
Quick Poll
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/27113005/Video-Tip-Required-IFR-Reports.png10001250Eric Radtkehttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngEric Radtke2026-08-28 08:55:132026-08-28 09:02:51Ask the IFR Expert: How Often Should I Hand Fly?
Modern avionics and autopilots have transformed IFR flying, reducing workload and improving situational awareness when used correctly. But automation is only as effective as the pilot managing it. Misunderstanding system capabilities, relying on automation at the wrong time, or failing to monitor what it’s doing can quickly turn a helpful tool into a source of confusion.
This month’s quiz tests your knowledge of IFR automation, from GPS approvals and navigation sensitivity to best practices for managing advanced avionics.
Automation in aircraft has proven:
Correct!Wrong!
Which statement is most accurate as it relates to automation in aviation?
Correct!Wrong!
In advanced avionics aircraft, proper automation management requires:
Correct!Wrong!
Authorization to conduct any GPS operation under IFR requires that:
Correct!Wrong!
If you are flying a GPS approach and manually override the sensitivity, what happens?
Most instrument approaches are straightforward. You brief the procedure, monitor the weather, and fly the approach you’ve planned. But sometimes the weather changes just enough to make that decision a lot more complicated.
That’s the challenge in this month’s IFR Mastery scenario from PilotWorkshops, The Minimums at Meadville, featuring award-winning instructor Doug Stewart.
After a routine IFR flight home in a Piper Seminole, the destination weather has deteriorated beyond what the forecast promised. Several approaches are available, but none is a perfect choice. One offers lower minimums. Another provides the convenience of vertical guidance. Wind, visibility, runway alignment, and your backup plan all become part of the equation.
Would you stick with your original plan, or is another approach the smarter first choice?
Before making your decision, watch the free scenario briefing below and see how you would handle the arrival.
There isn’t always one “right” answer
One of the most valuable aspects of instrument flying is learning to recognize the tradeoffs behind every decision. Often, the challenge isn’t knowing how to fly an approach—it’s deciding which approach offers the greatest margin of safety given the conditions.
That’s exactly what IFR Mastery is designed to develop.
Each month, PilotWorkshops presents a new real-world IFR scenario that puts you in the pilot’s seat. You’ll evaluate the situation, make your decision, and then—inside the full program—compare your thinking with experienced instructors as they explain the factors that influenced their choice.
Think you’ve made the right call?
Watch the free scenario briefing above, then start a free 30-day trial to access the complete scenario, instructor analysis, and the full library of VFR and IFR Mastery scenarios.
https://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/04112916/New-IFR-Mastery-Scenario-Which-Approach-Would-You-Request.png10001250Eric Radtkehttps://media.ifrfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/14115136/IFR-Focus-Logo_White_Blue_Web-01.pngEric Radtke2026-08-21 08:55:552026-08-04 11:29:59New IFR Mastery Scenario: Which Approach Would You Request?
Keeping up: Managing Busy Airspace
/by Elaine KauhFlying on instruments into big cities is a great way to use the rating – you’re always on a published IFR procedure, guided by ATC. You can land right in the metro area, close to transportation and destination options. Pilots based under a Class B shelf or at a high-traffic Class C airport are probably familiar with these perks and are used to busy airspace. For those who fly in quieter environments, though, “big and busy” can seem overwhelming. But it’s well within any IFR pilot’s capabilities if treated like challenging weather or a new aircraft – using training, preparation, and personal minimums to expand the envelope safely.
Routing and Orientation
Let’s begin by pointing out that flying IFR into Bravo airspace isn’t as scary as you might think once you see the process. Start with routing, and know that STARs (Standard Terminal Arrivals) and SIDs (Standard Instrument Departures) are your friends. If you learned that small aircraft can file “No STARs/SIDs” and get away with it, that’s only partly true and depends on the airspace. This remark on the flight plan can be disregarded and often is – more on that later. Or it can cost you a lot of avgas because ATC will vector you around other aircraft flying those procedures.
With that in mind, let’s go to St. Louis Regional (KALN), just under the Class B shelf for Lambert International (KSTL). Check the weather and where the airline traffic is flowing to get an idea of where Approach is directing traffic to satellite airports. Also look at recently cleared routes to help file a feasible flight plan. Include an early fix from a STAR if it fits your arrival direction. Even if a procedure has speeds and altitudes for turbines or is labeled so, waypoints on these routes can be assigned to pistons at lower altitudes. For St. Louis Regional, there are two STARs. Coming from the north, you might use all or some of FARMR THREE. This is shared among other nearby airports, so be sure to find “St. Louis Regional” for designated runways using the STAR. If you expect the RNAV 11, notice that the STAR instructions include FASHE, an initial fix to the approach.
Route amendments are common, so review the charts and practice loading, activating and amending these on your avionics. That might include VNAV features on your GPS and autopilot, which are handy for crossing-altitude assignments. If you have GPSes 1 and 2 and can do quick changes, consider turning off the cross-fill to load a separate flight plan on the No. 2 with another possible route. This can help you find and spell a fix quickly to amend the active route, or even replace a flight plan. In fact, ATC often issues shortcuts on STARs when traffic allows and will clear you direct to an upcoming fix.
Managing Workload
It’s also common for ATC to break you off an arrival to vector you into an approach, so maintain situational awareness as you near a portion of the IAP. ATIS and preceding aircraft will give you early cues of what’s ahead. You might get instructions on airspeed, such as “maintain best forward speed” for spacing. In that case, the maximum IAS is up to you and ATC will monitor the situation. If told to “maintain 120 knots,” copy and comply. If you’re uncomfortable with any instruction, say “unable” and offer a compromise. If you can’t manage 120 knots, maybe 110 is workable. And even though they’re busy, controllers will address “say again” and requests to clarify routes or clearances. They do it for all types of aircraft. Sure, it’s best to minimize the transmissions and keep up with the flow, so this is where solid communications skills go a long way to help you fit into a fast-paced environment.
Along with ensuring you’re “up to speed” for this flight, your best line of defense is to manage workload. Take action the moment you feel you’re getting behind. If you’re not ready for that approach intercept, slowing down by 5–10 knots (or whatever you can) gives you that precious few seconds to check your setup. If you’re feeling rushed, you’re likely to start talking faster and pushing buttons quickly, making errors more likely. ATC has ways to help you buy time if you let them know. You can request speed changes, delay vectors, or even a hold at a fix that’s out of the way of the traffic flow. These tools are also available if there’s an issue you want to troubleshoot. This is why I like to step up my IFR fuel reserves when planning flights into busy airspace. Another reason to have as much fuel as practical is in case of delays that affect many aircraft at once, like thunderstorms or a sudden runway closure.
These strategies apply on the outbounds, too, starting on the ground. Like arrivals, SIDs (Standard Instrument Departures) can be part of a cleared route that uses all or part of the procedure. At St. Louis Regional, you’ll likely start with a departure heading and altitude followed by vectors towards a fix on the chart, as in the LINDBERGH NINE. This SID has three published transitions from the STL navaid for aircraft going southbound. All are straightforward, and you might get something even easier, like runway heading to 3000, then “cleared direct MYERZ” followed by a clearance to a fix on your route.
Training and Preparation
Some additional advice before flying in busy airspace:
It’s all about good situational awareness and cockpit management in a busy environment. These flights are a great opportunity to build knowledge and skills, which will help ensure you can fully enjoy the conveniences of going into big-city airports.
New IFR Mastery Scenario:The End Is Niagara?
/by Eric RadtkeWhat would you do if an engine problem developed in actual IMC but the nearest airport wasn’t necessarily your safest option?
That’s the dilemma in this month’s IFR Mastery scenario from PilotWorkshops, The End Is Niagara?, featuring instructor Martin Pauly.
You’re flying your RV-14 with your new spouse toward Niagara Falls when the engine suddenly begins running rough in IMC. One cylinder’s EGT and CHT are dropping rapidly, and your troubleshooting attempts don’t solve the problem. The nearest airport is only 10 miles away, but the instrument approach could leave you below glide range over hilly terrain. Better weather and potentially better options lie farther ahead.
Where would you go?
Watch the free scenario briefing below and make your decision.

There isn’t always one “right” answer
One of the most valuable aspects of instrument flying is learning to recognize the tradeoffs behind every decision. Often, the challenge isn’t knowing how to fly an approach—it’s deciding which approach offers the greatest margin of safety given the conditions.
That’s exactly what IFR Mastery is designed to develop. Each month, PilotWorkshops presents a new real-world IFR scenario that puts you in the pilot’s seat. You’ll evaluate the situation, make your decision, and then—inside the full program—compare your thinking with experienced instructors as they explain the factors that influenced their choice.
Think you’ve made the right call?
Watch the free scenario briefing above, then start a free 30-day trial to access the complete scenario, instructor analysis, and the complete library of VFR and IFR Mastery scenarios.
Before the Frequency Gets Busy
/by Tim DeckerProfessional Preparation for Single-Pilot IFR in Busy Airspace
The phone call came from a recently instrument-rated Cirrus pilot sitting at a busy Class B airport with the engine running. He had received his IFR clearance, but he did not understand what Air Traffic Control had given him. The frequency was busy, the FBO line person was watching and waiting patiently to marshal him out of parking, and the pressure he felt was increasing by the minute.
His problem was not that he could not fly an instrument approach. He had recently demonstrated that skill well enough to earn an instrument rating. His problem was that he had never experienced an operation like this.
The FAA’s Instrument Airplane Airman Certification Standards establish the knowledge and skills required for certification, but no practical test can reproduce every environment a pilot may encounter afterward. Although the ACS requires knowledge of Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs), Standard Terminal Arrival Routes (STARs), climb gradients, and associated constraints, the practical test does not specifically require an applicant to fly an actual SID or STAR or demonstrate the “climb via” and “descend via” clearances that commonly accompany them. Nor does it require operations at busy Class B or Class C airports where these procedures are routine.
Nevertheless, after earning an instrument rating, a pilot may legally depart Atlanta, arrive at Dallas/Fort Worth, or fly into Chicago O’Hare. The pilot in my opening story was qualified, but he had not yet developed the operational experience necessary to manage that environment comfortably.
In Part 121 operations, complex environments are managed through standardization, preparation, defined procedures, and shared cockpit responsibilities. A single pilot does not have another crewmember available to catch an error or absorb part of the workload, but many of the same professional habits can be adapted to the Part 91 cockpit. The objective is to anticipate workload before it arrives.
Prepare Before Engine Start
Professional pilots do not wait for the cockpit to become busy before preparing. If departing a large airport, review the likely runway and SID before contacting Clearance Delivery. Understand the routing, altitude restrictions, climb gradient, navigation requirements, and what a “climb via” clearance will require.
Consider using services that provide Pre-Departure Clearance (PDC) and digital ATIS when available through a compatible avionics or electronic flight bag provider. Receiving the clearance and D-ATIS electronically allows time to review the routing, study the SID, and program the Flight Management System before starting the engine. The objective is not merely convenience. It is reducing workload before the airplane begins moving.
If a clearance received via PDC or radio does not make sense, ask ATC to clarify it. Do not allow embarrassment or concern about occupying the frequency to turn uncertainty into an incorrect clearance. Controllers would rather clarify or repeat an instruction than have a pilot misunderstand it.
Avionics proficiency is equally important. Modern FMS and GPS navigators make complex procedures manageable—but only when the pilot understands how to use them. Before operating in busy terminal airspace, become proficient at loading and modifying SIDs, STARs, transitions, and approaches. Busy airspace is not the place to learn those functions for the first time.
One common trap involves STARs that divide into runway-specific segments. When loading the arrival, the navigator may require selection of the expected landing runway. Without that selection, the route may end near the waypoint where the STAR branches rather than continue along the appropriate runway transition. Understand how the installed avionics handle these procedures before encountering them under time pressure.
Use Cruise Time Wisely
Professional pilots rarely regard cruise as the boring part of a flight. It is valuable preparation time.
Obtain the destination weather and ATIS early enough to complete arrival planning before beginning the descent. Review the expected STAR, including its altitude and airspeed restrictions, and prepare the most likely approach. If more than one runway or approach appears likely, identify an alternate rather than waiting for a change from ATC.
Even when expecting a visual approach, load and brief an appropriate instrument approach as a backup—preferably one with vertical guidance. Resist the temptation to load a GPS-generated visual approach if your navigator offers that option. At many busy airports, controllers expect aircraft to navigate to the Final Approach Fix associated with the published ILS or RNAV approach because that is where speed restrictions and sequencing are often built into the arrival. Airline crews are generally required to have an instrument approach loaded in the FMS even when cleared for a visual approach, so ATC may issue instructions referencing that procedure. Loading the corresponding instrument approach improves situational awareness, supports those instructions, provides a stabilized vertical path, and reduces the chance of landing at the wrong airport or runway.
Loading a procedure is only the first step. Verify that you’ve selected the correct runway and transition, then compare the programmed flight plan with the current published chart. Confirm the lateral routing, altitude constraints, airspeed restrictions, and missed approach procedure. In a two-pilot flight deck, both crewmembers independently verify the programming. A single pilot doesn’t have that second set of eyes, making an unhurried chart-to-screen comparison even more important.
The briefing should be concise and useful. Rather than reading the chart aloud, brief the applicable minimums and enter them into your avionics if that capability is available. Then concentrate on what is unusual or most likely to cause an error: localizer frequency identification and setup, a difficult crossing restriction, terrain, an offset final, parallel runways, a complicated missed approach, runway conditions, or the possibility of a late runway change.
The purpose of a briefing is not to prove that you can read the chart. It is to identify threats before they demand your attention, verify that the waypoints loaded in the FMS match the current chart, and confirm that the correct approach minimums have been entered.
Know When to Say “Unable”
ATC clearances are designed to maintain an efficient traffic flow, but controllers cannot know every aircraft’s limitations. STARs serving airline hubs may contain speeds around 290 knots to sequence transport-category airplanes. That may exceed the operating limitations of many smaller general aviation aircraft.
If your aircraft cannot comply, advise ATC promptly: “Unable the 290 knots.” The same principle applies to climb gradients, descent rates, crossing restrictions, or any other clearance beyond the capabilities of the aircraft or pilot.
“Unable” is not a sign of weakness. It is useful information and a sign of sound judgment.
If an unexpected change requires additional programming, tell ATC that you need time. A request for extended vectors or additional track miles is preferable to hurried button-pushing while the airplane continues toward the terminal area. If necessary, request holding until the new procedure can be loaded, briefed, and verified.
ATC controls the sequence, but the pilot still controls whether the airplane is ready to proceed.
Do Not Forget the Airport
Ground operations deserve the same preparation as the flight itself. Many instrument training flights take place at airports with relatively simple taxiway layouts. At large Class B airports, however, taxiways often have two-letter identifiers. At Dallas/Fort Worth, for example, a clearance might include Taxiways EM or EL. To a pilot encountering those names for the first time, the instructions may sound like a rapid string of unrelated letters.
Have the airport diagram open before the airplane moves. Review hotspots, anticipate the likely taxi route, and write down lengthy instructions. If uncertain, stop the aircraft and ask Ground Control for clarification.
Arrival planning should continue through landing and taxi. Before touchdown, anticipate the likely runway exit and know the general direction of parking. This is not the time to be asking yourself, “Do I turn off to the right or left?” At a large airport, the workload does not end when the wheels touch the runway.
Creating Time
Busy airspace is not challenging merely because controllers talk quickly or airports are large. It is challenging because several high-workload tasks can occur simultaneously, and ATC generally expects pilots to understand and promptly comply with the clearances they accept.
The pilot who first begins thinking about the arrival after top of descent will probably feel rushed. The pilot who has already reviewed the STAR, prepared an alternate approach, verified the avionics, briefed the threats, opened the airport diagram, and considered the taxi route will often find the same operation surprisingly manageable.
The objective is not to make a personal airplane operate like an airliner. It is to borrow the professional habits that allow airline crews to manage complex operations safely and efficiently.
Busy airspace rewards preparation and exposes its absence. Review the procedures early, understand the capabilities of your avionics and aircraft, brief the threats, and create additional time whenever the operation begins moving faster than you can safely manage it.
The frequency may be busy, but the cockpit does not have to be. Staying ahead of the airplane begins long before the controller starts talking quickly.
Ask the IFR Expert: How Often Should I Hand Fly?
/by Eric RadtkeThere is no magic number of minutes or percentage of a flight that every instrument pilot should spend hand-flying. The right balance depends on the pilot, the airplane, the conditions, and the workload. But there is an important distinction between using automation and becoming dependent on it.
If the autopilot is available, working properly, and reducing workload and fatigue, that’a s good thing and there is nothing inherently wrong with using it extensively—even for an entire IFR flight. The key is to make sure you’re still maintaining the skills required to fly the airplane when the automation isn’t available.
Make proficiency part of your normal flying
One of the easiest ways to maintain hand-flying skills is to incorporate short periods of manual flying into routine flights when conditions and workload permit. For example, you might establish a personal rule to hand-fly the departure through a certain altitude, or disconnect the autopilot for a portion of the arrival. You could also hand-fly an approach when you’re in VMC or under simulated instrument conditions and have a safety pilot. So rather than thinking, “I should hand-fly more,” establish habits or general rules that make it happen.
Practice meaningful skills
Hand-flying isn’t simply keeping the wings level. Use those opportunities to practice the skills you’ll actually need if the automation becomes unavailable. Work on precise heading and altitude control, airspeed management, intercepts, course tracking, approaches, missed approaches, and transitions between different phases of flight. If you’re flying with a safety pilot or CFII, use the opportunity to introduce realistic challenges rather than simply flying a perfectly smooth, straight-and-level segment.
The goal isn’t to prove that you can fly without the autopilot. It’s to remain proficient when you’re forced to.
Don’t turn proficiency practice into a problem
There’s also a danger in taking the “hand-fly more” philosophy too far. If you’re in actual IMC, navigating complex airspace, dealing with weather, managing a high-workload arrival, or troubleshooting another problem, there may be no good reason to disconnect a perfectly functioning autopilot simply to get some practice. Automation is a tool for managing workload. Use it when it provides a safety or workload advantage.
Be ready for the day automation isn’t available
An autopilot failure in benign VMC is an inconvenience. An unexpected automation problem in IMC, during a busy arrival, or while managing an approach can immediately increase workload. The pilot who regularly practices hand-flying doesn’t have to learn—or relearn—the skill at the same time they’re dealing with the problem that caused the automation to become unavailable.
That’s the real goal of proficiency. Use automation because it makes you a better, more capable pilot—not because you’ve forgotten how to fly without it.
Quick Poll
Quiz: Automation
/by IFR Focus TeamModern avionics and autopilots have transformed IFR flying, reducing workload and improving situational awareness when used correctly. But automation is only as effective as the pilot managing it. Misunderstanding system capabilities, relying on automation at the wrong time, or failing to monitor what it’s doing can quickly turn a helpful tool into a source of confusion.
This month’s quiz tests your knowledge of IFR automation, from GPS approvals and navigation sensitivity to best practices for managing advanced avionics.
Share the quiz to show your results !
Facebook
Facebook
Share your results :
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
New IFR Mastery Scenario: Which Approach Would You Request?
/by Eric RadtkeMost instrument approaches are straightforward. You brief the procedure, monitor the weather, and fly the approach you’ve planned. But sometimes the weather changes just enough to make that decision a lot more complicated.
That’s the challenge in this month’s IFR Mastery scenario from PilotWorkshops, The Minimums at Meadville, featuring award-winning instructor Doug Stewart.
After a routine IFR flight home in a Piper Seminole, the destination weather has deteriorated beyond what the forecast promised. Several approaches are available, but none is a perfect choice. One offers lower minimums. Another provides the convenience of vertical guidance. Wind, visibility, runway alignment, and your backup plan all become part of the equation.
Would you stick with your original plan, or is another approach the smarter first choice?
Before making your decision, watch the free scenario briefing below and see how you would handle the arrival.
There isn’t always one “right” answer
One of the most valuable aspects of instrument flying is learning to recognize the tradeoffs behind every decision. Often, the challenge isn’t knowing how to fly an approach—it’s deciding which approach offers the greatest margin of safety given the conditions.
That’s exactly what IFR Mastery is designed to develop.
Each month, PilotWorkshops presents a new real-world IFR scenario that puts you in the pilot’s seat. You’ll evaluate the situation, make your decision, and then—inside the full program—compare your thinking with experienced instructors as they explain the factors that influenced their choice.
Think you’ve made the right call?
Watch the free scenario briefing above, then start a free 30-day trial to access the complete scenario, instructor analysis, and the full library of VFR and IFR Mastery scenarios.